
- #Mastercam v 9.1 wire how to
- #Mastercam v 9.1 wire install
- #Mastercam v 9.1 wire windows 10
- #Mastercam v 9.1 wire software
- #Mastercam v 9.1 wire code
For large toolpath generation and simulation, we recommend 32GB of RAM.

We recommend a minimum of 8 GB of memory. When Mastercam uses all available RAM, it switches to using virtual memory space, which is stored on the hard drive and will dramatically slow the system down. We typically see a 50% reduction in toolpath calculation time with the latest Intel i7 or Xeon processors. Toolpath calculation and Simulation will generally run faster with a multi-core processor. With each release, more and more aspects of Mastercam are becoming multi-core processor aware.
#Mastercam v 9.1 wire software
The processor speed will impact how fast the software will calculate and complete tasks.
#Mastercam v 9.1 wire install
Future versions of Mastercam will not install on Windows 7. Mastercam 2022 will install on Windows 7 systems but will not be supported. Mastercam 2021 was the last release to officially support Windows 7 as Microsoft ended extended support for the OS in January 2020. While Mastercam may run on other Windows editions (such as Home Edition) or virtual environments (such as Parallels for Mac), it has not been tested on these configurations and is therefore not supported.
#Mastercam v 9.1 wire windows 10
We recommend using Windows 10 (version 20H2 or later) or later 64-bit Professional editions. View Detailed Requirements And Suggestions OPERATING SYSTEMSĬNC Software continues to review the operating system (OS) requirements for Mastercam with a goal of providing the best possible user experience for our customers.
#Mastercam v 9.1 wire how to
there's a lot of power in their posts you just have to know how to harness it.
#Mastercam v 9.1 wire code
that's the CL file number (although no t correct in my example) and you can use that to write logic in your post to output the code you wish to use. for example if you right click on the feed per revolution box under a solidmill facing cycle and click edit properties the window will have (123) in the title bar.

if you are in the esprit interface and you right click on any box in the operation windows you can click the "edit properties" and on the top it will tell you the CLfile number for what each box is linking to. as far as the CLfile stuff goes, you have to view the cutter location file (clfile), extended NC code and all of that for debugging so you can see whether to use nextclfile or currentclfile data and so on and so forth. the only advice i can really give you is to read the post help and if you go to you can order their instructional videos on post processor creation. Well, I just started working with one of the engineers from DP technology and after he showed me a few things i was off to the races working on my own stuff and modifying posts to my liking. I'll take your advice, and I'll call their home office if I have trouble.Īlso, I got the following piece of advice from that I located in an older post on CNCzone and contacted him asking if he had any advice on learning the post processing format. There's still a lot of work to do however. If course if I was cutting stuff that thick, I wouldn't be able to remove the slug anyway without jogging the machine over to the side too. The only problem will come when I'm cutting really thick stuff (which won't happen) and the machine Z's up beyond the physical limits of the axis. He simply told us "It's not programmable, and even on more advanced machines, it doesn't work." Needless to say, I managed to figure it out, and it's working well. Then, our local support guy tells us that there's no way for the machine to automatically raise the nozzle after cutting off the slugs so we can remove them, and that we have to manually jog the head up and down. They insist that "everything is fine" and that it's something I'm doing, which is completely BS - Why would the post processor, with all it's big bad if then conditional arguments, be incapable of cutting the wire before rapiding to the next threading point? A day of learning and playing with the post got this problem fixed - but come on! I'm not the only guy that has this problem - can't be!
